(We
completed our half-way blogs only a week ago.
Therefore, I do not have any new comments about where I have come in
this unit or about what I have learned.
So, I will just quote my half-way blog on those two issues.)
“Every day we encounter hundreds of different
types of genres. When we come across or even
use these different genres, we do not normally think about the type of the
genre. Often we only consider the
immediate trajectory that our employed genres will take. We do not often realize the immense impact
that our writing (no matter the type of genre) possesses once it is out of our
hands. A text message may only have one
intended recipient. However, once that
text message has left the author’s phone, it has the possibility of being
forwarded to others, discussed later in conversations, posted on the internet,
etc. Unit One, English 101, teaches us
to consider all these factors, and helps us to more readily be able to
recognize different types of genres.
Due
to the great impact that a genre that we produce can have, it is important to
review our work or have another review it before putting it in others’
hands. Peer reviews are a great way to
get opinions about your work, especially if it has an intended professional
trajectory. That is, if it is a project
for school or anything linked to a career or job.
Peer
reviews can be extremely helpful, but many people are not educated in how to
conduct a proper peer review. Many only
give too general or downright mean (not constructive criticism) comments, or
they make overly gracious comments due to fear of offending the author. None of these help the author to improve
their writing skills. In order to
effectively critique another’s work, one must learn to write constructive comments. One must have the following things in mind
before approaching critiquing another’s work: thought through expectations of
peer review (have the mindset of critiquing other’s work in a way that you
would want your own work critiqued), have an “open mind to the possibility that
I will learn just as much (if not more) from giving my peers feedback on their
work as I will from receiving theirs on mine,” and “read like a writer, not
like a judge” (approach another’s work by trying to see it from their
perspective). (quotes from “Grassroots”)
I
have also learned in this Unit about how each genre has a typical layout/format
and typical criteria. There are also
“rules” that our society has added to different kinds of genres. A great example of this is the wedding toast
that we discussed in class. The wedding
toast has a certain time during the reception that it occurs, it is usually
done by a specific group of people in attendance, it is usually spoken –but has
thoughts written on notecards to help with the giving of the speech, as well as
many other characteristics like these.
Even though there is a standard make-up to each genre and a specific
method that is used to send the message (i.e.: phone, computer, speaker, paper,
etc.) there can always be exceptions.
Exceptions must have logical and justifiable reasons in why they are
straying from the typical method or format.” (My half-way blog)
The
“big takeaway” for me will be how I learned how to put together a newspaper
article. I had never written in that
genre before, and it was very interesting to me. I will most likely use this genre of
newspaper articles in my future for school newspapers or local newspapers. I enjoy writing and informing others of topics
that are near to my heart.
I
do not have any questions from this unit.
I
fully understood the concept of making a rubric and how to apply the rubric to
create my own example of the genre. I
also understood how to make constructive criticism in peer review
sessions. With the rubric, I did a good
job at dissecting all the different parts of visual and grammatical characteristics
that made up the genre of newspaper articles.
I feel that I applied the rubric well to my own article. In peer review sessions, I had helpful
comments for my peers. They appreciated
my feedback.
Now,
I will justify things about my final draft of my article. Most online articles have the name of the
newspaper at the top of the article followed by a web link. Since I wrote my own article, I made up my own
newspaper name and web link for visual format purposes. This article’s intended audience is Music
Education majors that are still finishing up their degree here at ISU. Some of the angles presented in the article
may make more sense to Music majors than other students. Since the students in ENG101 are not music
majors, I decided to ask people in the major for feedback too. So, I had a few music majors also read
through my article and give me feedback.
The music majors really liked my article and suggested that I make it
available for other ISU music majors to read.
One, ENG101, student was confused about was the fact that I discussed
general music programs. He could not see
the connection between general music programs and professional orchestras. But, as all music majors and anyone who has
been in a school band program know, the general music programs and middle
school band programs are the beginning stages to getting to the professional
orchestras. Without these programs we
would not have professional orchestras.
Also, if people are taught to enjoy something at a young age, they are
more likely to support it when the get older – even if they are no longer
playing an instrument themselves. It is
also important to reach the parents of the children, because the parents can
encourage the student to keep growing as a musician. Making an impression on the parents may give
the school band or orchestra program more money which can equal in more opportunities
for the school band to perform for the community. This will then reach more than just the band
kids and their families. That is why I
talked to a middle school band director, and why I discuss general music and
middle and high school programs. They
are the basis for professional orchestras having performers to be in them as
well as the basis for their support from fans.
·
Sources used for information:
Grassroots book and class notes, slides, class blog, and my recent half-way blog.
I appreciate your justification of the choices made in your article. It's always nice to see where people are coming from in regards to creating their various article. It's okay to not have too many new thoughts as, for this unit anyways, the first blog was written pretty close to the second unit. However, I think that here is also the point, at least for next time, when you can consider context, etc. in the actual writing of your article. As you sat down to do so, how you did you consider all that you had learning in this class? How did this affect your process? Were there issues? Etc.?
ReplyDelete